10 FEBRUARY 2007, Page 34

Nature's wonders

James Delingpole The other day Boy sat the scholarship for possibly the most gorgeously wonderful prep school in the land, where the teaching is so inspiring, the headmaster so charming and the general aura of happiness so palpable it makes you want to weep — especially when you realise that, even if your lad got the 25 per cent reduction, you still couldn't afford it anyway.

Maybe at the back of our minds was the idea that the school would decide Boy was so unutterably brilliant they'd go, 'Look. Never mind the fees. Your child is a wonder of nature. How much do you want? Fifty grand do you? A hundred?' I expect there are quite a few straitened middleclass parents out there who harbour similar thoughts about their offspring. But these delusions wouldn't have survived a viewing of Child Genius (Channel 4, Thursday).

This documentary series is going to follow the progress over the years of ten gifted children. To qualify as 'gifted' a child needs to be in the top 2 per cent intellectually, though the ones here were miles more rarefied than that. At least two of them had IQ levels of 170. One was admitted to the Royal Academy of Music aged six. Another — did I hear this aright? — was reading at four and a half months.

Another, aged 11, spoke (supposedly) seven languages including old Norse (yeah, really? Not even Oxford dons can do that) and Mandarin, and cooked gag-inducingly pretentious cuisine like undercooked pigeon in mediaeval sauce. All of them were scarily, freakily, nauseatingly bright.

What you quickly realised is that having a genius kid isn't the path to joy and ease you imagined it would be. Even when they get scholarships to great schools they are resented by their classmates, and are too often cocky and disruptive. Worse, when you arrive home knackered from work, you then have to spend several more gruelling hours tutoring your wunderkind in advanced chemistry, further maths or chess. Otherwise their superpowerful brains grow restive and they trash your home and try to kill their younger siblings (whose lives have already been ruined because, thanks to brainbox, they grow up convinced they're thick).

Not all of the children were ghastly. I warmed greatly to ten-year-old chess prodigy Peter, who, asked what he planned to do if he didn't become world chess champion, replied that it wasn't worth thinking about because he'd already calculated his odds of failure — five in a million. What I loved was the matter-of-fact way in which he said it. This wasn't idle boasting — merely the rational observation of someone who knew how good he was, and hadn't been conditioned by antielitist teachers into feeling bad about it.

It's depressing how rare that sort of intellectual assurance is, these days. I blame the state education system. The C of E primary school that my children go to is a lot better than most, but, no matter how hard it tries, it will always be shackled by the left-liberal orthodoxy imposed on it by the government, the unions and the Spartist educational theorists.

When I went to a parents' evening the other day, for example, the teachers didn't once mention how my children were performing academically. Instead, they wanted to draw my attention to the fact that, while my children were apparently very good at putting across their point of view in group discussions, they were less interested in listening to and valuing the opinions of others.

But I don't want my children being taught this PC codswallop. I don't want them being taught that all other religions and value systems are as great and good as the Judaeo–Christian one that we've spent the last two millennia honing to near perfection. I don't want them growing up to think that being thick is just as OK as being bright, because it's just not.

And though I must say I was blown away by an impromptu speech David Willetts gave at a dinner party the other night about his plans for education reform — he really is a splendid, deeply thoughtful fellow, not at all the robotic geek you might expect somebody nicknamed 'Two Brains' to be — I don't think any of our political parties are remotely capable of clearing up the Augean mess that is our state system. It was designed — as per Gramsci's instructions — by revolutionaries whose intention wasn't to see our children bettereducated but simply to destroy everything the civilised world holds dear.

Um, anyway, I can't remember what else I was going to say about Child Genius before I got sidetracked by that little rant. Nor whether I might have found room for the final episode of Room 101 starring Ian Hislop nor the adaptation of James Landale's excellent book on duelling. But it's too late now, I'm out of space.