merely to save the time which must have been wasted

in what he consi- partrnents-there had been but one refractory-conscript on an aye- ' dered a useless discussion. M. C. Perrier describes the first meeting of r ige 'per annum ; in four other's only one hi two years ; in the the Deputies, which was held at his hotel, when the public protest leas ' Vosges, not One in ten years. St;DLT has declared that sueh' is dmwn up. Some people who assembled before the house were dispersed ' the erithuSiasin of the departments, that 'Ministers do not want any- by the Gens d'annes, andtwo of them killed. This was on Tuesday, and '-the---the Citizens are quite sufficient' for 'the maintenande. of before M. Lafitte's arrival from the country, which did not take place the dignify of the nation. The 'Chamber of Deputies have ex- until late on.Tuesdav night. The subseuent meetings Were held at the mansion of M.'de Pilyraveati. 'M. Mangan, who was in ill health at 'Pie . 'tended the protection of the state to Jewish religious teachers : time, had intended to quit Paris on the 19th, but stopped, at the earnest this is said to be intended to conciliate their favour in behalf of the entreaty of a friend, who assured him that a coup (Mat was meditated. • loan meditated-by M.- LASITTE. We do not recollect of any pre- and would make its appearance on the 25th or 26th. They describe the . vicus instance of !Jewish priests receiving a government allowance interview with Marmont in the same wordsas does M. Litfitte. The-facts swornto by the host of other witnesses have most of them but small con- -in any country -since thetall Of ,Jerusalem. The vote was not car- nexion with the Ministers. M. Bilot, King's Procureur of the tribithal

• :

-zed tinaninionsly. of Premiere Instance, states that the prosecutions directed against seldral - -An altdrimit Of 'a'General Rzcntraotcr, on the 6th, to excite the viriters and publishers, beeau'se of the protest the Deputies, were whdlly Chambers against England, was -very generally scouted by all his own, and that he had no instruction on the subject. A great • ''sides'cif the assembly. lard GriviLtE has been •gazetted as number of military officers, and of police commissaries, were examined ; 'chiefly, it appears, forthe purpose of proving that when the order to re . 'British AnibasSador at Paris; instetta of Lord STUART DE ROTAsAY. was given, previous to the order declaring Paris in a-state of siege .(for General eLAIISE.L has Oiled prime important advantages over that was tantamount to a Proclamation of martial law), the summonses the boasting Bey Of Titen ; but these distant exploits, that some .to' retire required by law were not 'made,—or, as we would say, he months ago attracted SO much, now hardly excite any attention The riot act was not read. This fact seems to be established beyond a denbt.

at Eill. . The adventures'of the several witnesses are not without interest, but

, :portant one, is mentioned by General de St. Chamans. On the evening The 'preliminaiy examinatiOns respecting the'accused Ministers,of the 28th, three chaises carried off all the military -that had been 'required by the law Of Piano.% 'haire' all been published. We Dien- wounded at the }Mel de Ville, duringa day on which, it is cilculitted, Apnea *last week, that a.few Of them had appeared, and that they about seven hundred Of the 'people Were kiffedtia the attempt to take the were exceedingly long. What.was long then, is now voluminous. building. All-the military and gendarmerie officers- speak to the defect,

' a space-as possible, to give our Or rather total want of general orders. Neither 'at-the offices of thepo-

-We shall endeavour, in as small ' Waders an idea Of their contents. lice, nor at the quarters of the general staff, -does there seem to-have been any plan arranged to meet the possiblacase of resistance on the•part 'The first eightdbetnnents -consist of the interrogatories and answers of of the people; and when it happened, every thing remained to be ar. . the accused, each Of Whom Was examined twice. In what 'we Would'eall ranged- on the moment, and, as is usual in such cases, .nothing was ar- ' 'his eitaraniationin'elliet'Prinee'POtIONAC admits that he tignedthe -re- ranged prudently or energetically. Marmont Seems to have had but•sine , port to the King, on which the celebrated ordinances were founded; the , order, and but one rule—namely, to oppose force to force. If the latdifittrite for dedlining'Perisln A state of siege ; that for the iritrodun; pie attacked the sealers; the soldieris were to defend theniselVes; 'i e tion,of the proposed eletteral tystern'; and,'generally;that hpattitiPiderd people did not- attack the Soldiers, it appears they Might do as ey vidtti his'colleagues'inthe ilraWing up of the sarhele. He denies all knciw.. pleased, and the'scildiers were toll° nothing at all. One of the witnesses 'ledge of the s'unaffientes Which Weraserit tithe memberaiffthe'Cliiiiibers mentions, that whenbfarmont was informed, On the 26th, Of the issed of - to meet in Paris,Iifter itliadbeen restilited thin Wey'slibild never meet . the'ordintenceS, he expressed the greatest 'passible surprise. Whether again;, lie only knew of their existence -by the- letter which he 'received, this was genuine, or the consummation of hypocrisy, it is, of -emir-001ot tholic inhabitants of Cullen, and of Mill Street, Cork. 'General Coutard. No inatructns were given to Marmont. The Prhffie Poor-Latos.—For the eatabllshment of Poor-Laws in Ireland. Inhabitants of denies having advised the declaring of Paris to be in a state of Siege, Whtteehureh. though he signed the document by which 'it was declared. He denies hair- 'Subletting Act.—For"the repeal thereof. rnhahltants of the united parishes of ing issued any orders to fire upon the people, or that he had any intentibn Skreen and Rathfigh ; and of Dunsany and Kilmisson. of abrogating the Charter. The troops at Luneville'and St: Omer we're Tithesand U74i071.—Occupiers of land in the union of Middleton. Trade.—For the repeal of the drawback on importation of English soap into Ire- ordered to march 'to St. Cloud to protect the King; and, as Minister of

War, he signed the order. He knew that money was distributed to laud, and for placing the manufactures of both countries on an equal footing. the Licensed soap-boilers and chandlers of Galway • labourers of Tankerdstovin. troops at Paris; but did not know by whom, or from what fund it Was

Union.—For the repeal of the—Inhabitants of Grange Gorman ; working carpet- paid. The report of the proposed establishment of courts-martial, Its weavers of Dublin ; Inhabitants of Garrestown, of Naas ; of bricklayers of the City well as the contemplated arrest of the Deputies, he declares to be wholly and Liberties of Dublin ; of the sedan ehairmen of Dublin ; of house-smiths of without foundation. The only important fact elicited on the 'cross-ext.- Dublin ; of John Howard, of Portarlington ; of inhabitants of Cullen, of Them ;

parishioners of St. Patrick, Waterford ; of inhabitants of Granard ; parishioners of mination of Polignac, is that on the 29th the whole of the Cabinet re- parishioners Inhabitants of St. John, Waterford ; of the united parishes of St. signed ; and their resignations were accepted, and the ordinances revoked. Andrevv, Ann, Mark, and Peter, Dublin ; of , Clondegad ; journeymen house- Charles was quite willing to treat when he could do nothing else.

painters of Dublin; bookbinders of Dublin ; inhabitants of Knockboy ; of Ole- M. DE PEYRONNET explained the fact of the summonses to the Deputies nalvy ; Roman Catholics of Conohy, Ballyraget, and other places. Inhabitants of and Peers, by stating that the original document was signed by the King, Butler's Town ; of Beagh ; of Old Town, Dublin ; of St. Michael and St. John,

and the usual orders transmitted to the proper offices, when, as a matter Dublin; Peter Kyce, freeholder of Roscommon ; inhabitants of Abbey _Knockmoy; journeymen bakers of Limerick ; inhabitants of Youghall. of course, these summonses were issued while the dissolution of the , Chambers was yet in discussion. He also denies any intention of destroy

-

Musses WHO HAVE OBTAINRD LEAVE OF ABSENCE. ing the Charter. These men have curious ideas on the subject of destrdy- E. A'Court • three weeks.'... Dec. 6. ing charters. Peyronnet was the author, or reviser rather, of the now Blandford, Marquis of three weeks ... Dec. 6. electoral project contained in the ordinances. He concurred in the whole Davies, Hastings a fortnight .... Dec. 6. Of these documents, but they were not agreed to without discussion ; dui Estcourt, S. B three weeks ... Dec. 6. the Court insinuates that he opposed them in the Council ; and he abo

Holdsworth, — a week Dec. 6. The evidence of CHANTELATIZE is curious. He drew up the report bra

Jermyn, Earl a fortnight .... Dec. 6. which the ordinances were Ostensibly founded; but, in fact, the repdrt

Tynte, K. K.. a fortnight -.... Dec. 6. was an afterthought, and it was concocted for the public eye, after the

ordinances had been deliberated on and agreed to ! The ordinances were NEW WRITS MOVED FOR. agreed to somewhere about the 10th of July—a fortnight before they , St. Germain's Sir Henry Hardinge Chiltern Hundreds. GUERNON DE RANVILLE states, that he opposed the ordinance for alter.:

PaocutEss OF BILLS BROUGHT IN• ins the electoral system, as contrary to the King's oath to maintain the Charitable Institutions Bill—Second reading put of for six months. Charter ; and that he opposed the suspension of the law of the press, he-

Colonials Acts Validity Bill—To be read a third time on Monday. cause, though he considered such a suspension as part of the Royal pre..

Colonial Trade Bill-I-To be read a second time on Monday. rogative, he did not think a sufficient case Made out. He proposed to

Consolidated Fund Bill—Read a third time on Tuesday, and passed. ,i the Council to meet the Chambers, and to submit to them a modification Game Bill—Read a second time on Tuesday, and committed for Monday next. of the law of the press. -He states that Peyronnet also was opposed,in time February 16. the Council, to the ordinances, both on their deliberation and on the

Liability of Landlords Bill—Second reading appointed for Monday next. The whole of the Ministers deny, that in the original formation of the Land-Tax Commissioners' Name Bill—Read a second time on Thursday, and Ministry there *as any intention of attacking the Charter or the laws;

committed for Thursday, February 17. and they reject with abhorrence the imputation of having consulted Regency Bill—Read a second time on Thuraday. with M. Lisoire, the inventor of incendiary missiles, for the purpose toe

t Stage Coaches Bill—Read first time on Friday; second reading appointed for Fe- The first witness interrogated was the Count de Simonville, an elderly ,binary 21. peer ; and the energy and quantity of his declarations seem to have been

Tailzie's Relief Bill, Regulation Bill, and Amendment Bill—Read first time on equal. All that we can nether from a couple of columns of ejaculatiohs„

Joseph Macdonnell. with extraordinary energy, on their joint arrival at the chateau. AstO - broker, who was examined, mentions some facts relating to -the f,inUs, The French papers bf Vie week supply but small matter-which thative.not without interest. The expectation. of some coup cupid vtas at any time, 'and Still less .Whielit; under the •-existing-eireuEastahees general for a couple of months before it tookplace, chie'" fly on acbdunt,o£ of England,-could Stipplrus with -occasicin for eithercomment or the speculations of M. Ouvrard for a fall. The persons in cornmunicatihre criticism`• a pretty tine sigh' that the ' affairs of France'are doing with 1V1. de Peyronnet, it is added, speculated for a rise. The cOnchisioni well. -The Ministers have taken a votecf credit from the Cham- plated sought diiln

they have norlirect bearing on the issue to be tried. One fact, an im...

the Peers.' 'Mallet was., however, brought out by this third examination; but that the document declaring Paris in a state of siege was deliberated on Tuesday night, and carried to the King for signature on Wednesday morning. This act, by which the inhabitants of the capital 'Viere -made amenable to martial law, was not prorriulgatedin_any way ; it was merely delivered to Ma,rmont, to act upon it.. Fromthe moment thatthis dbcu- silent was signed, Ministers entirely suspended their tunctiotia, leaving Marmont to act as his discretion might direct. The Prince adds; that, a fortnight previous to the' issue .of the 'ordinances, he had -expressed a strong wish to the King to resign, or at least to cease to hold the office- of Premier.

la In the examination of PEYRONNET, a curious fact is stated—he com- municated to a friend, by way of gratifying news, so late as Sunday night, the fact of that friend's having been elected a deputy. This was after the ordinances were signed dissolving the Chambers. De .Peyron,net men- tions, that only 7000 infantry were engaged at Paris in the fight of the three days ; even the troops of Vincennes were not called Mt to act, so • little did Ministers expect any resistance. The deposition of the ViScount de Foucatild, ex-colonel of the Gendar- merie, states that he had an order .for- arresting five or six-of the depu- ties, amOng whore were MM. Latitte and Lafayette ; but after the depu- tation of the Chamber had communicated with Marmont, by whom the order was Signed, herevoked it. A letter from the Marquis de Choiseul, dated Brighton, October 10, and produced by another witness,. M. de Guise, chef de battalion, seems to prove that on the 25th not even mar- mont had been acquainted with the ordinances ; as, on that very day, he gave leave to the Marquis de Choiseul for three days to Visit his friends seven leagues beyond St. Cloud. The. Commission of the Peers have published a long report, founded on these various examinations. It is more favourable to the aCcused than that Of the Deputies, by omitting a number of charges—such as that of occasioning the fires in Normandy— which rested on no better evidence than rumour

•