15 AUGUST 1835, Page 2

The French journals are full of conjectures and assertions as

to the accomplices or instigators of FIESCHI, but contain no facts tending to throw additional light on the subject. The Republicans maintain that the assassin is a Carlist in the pay of the Dutchess DE BERRI; and that his principal accomplice is the person who furnished the saddle on which the Dutchess rode during her Vendean expedition. On the other hand, the Ministerial newspapers declare that nothing has trans- pired tending to implicate the Carlists in the plot ; and labour to prove that FIESCHI could only have been the instrument of the Republican faction. In the mean time, it seems to be allowed on all hands, that FIESCHI, though repeatedly questioned by TRIERS, obstinately refuses to betray his fellow conspirators, and declares that he alone is guilty. Be appears to feel no remorse for his crime ; the fatal effects of which, to their full extent, have been concealed from him.

The Committees of the Chamber of Deputies are engaged in ma- turing the laws for coercing the press. It is said that Louts PHILIP recoils from their dangerous severity, and has recommended that in several points, especially those which relate to the prohibition of all mention of the King's name and attacks on his policy, they should be rendered less stringent. The severe remarks of the English journals of all parties are said to have annoyed the King, and disconcerted his Ministers, especially the Duke DE BROGLIE and THIERS. It seems that the majority of the Chamber of Deputies is entirely subservient to the Court, and is ready to pass any law that may be laid before it by the Ministers.