16 SEPTEMBER 2000, Page 56

BRIDGE

Classic subterfuge

Susanna Gross

IT CAME as no surprise to learn the other day that 'Nasty Nick', whose duplicitous behaviour on Big Brother won him such renown, is a keen bridge player. Nick — a member of Andrew Robson's club in Par- son's Green — displayed all the attributes of a gifted player on the show: a ruthless determination to win, a clear strategy, and, above all, great deceptive skills.

Deception is a vital part of bridge and, so I'm told, it makes Nick Bateman a tricksy opponent at the table. This week's hand, in which I was bamboozled by my friend Neil Mendoza, involved a classic subterfuge that Nick would have been proud of: Dealer South Neither side vulnerable 4 A Q J 10

✓ 7 6 ♦ 10 9 6 2 # J 8 7

4 7 6 4 V K 10 8 5

♦ K 3 2

4

♦ 9 8 3 2 J 9 4 5 4 W

N

E # A K 10 4 • K 5 ♦ A Q 3 ♦ A Q J 8 7 + 5 3 2

The Bidding South West North East

110 pass 14 pass 1NT pass 2NT pass 3NT pass pass pass Against Neil's 3NT contract, I kicked off with the V5. Despite my friendly lead, Neil saw that, if the diamone finesse was not working, a switch to clubs would almost certainly defeat the contract. So, instead of winning with the ♦Q, he won with the VA! He then crossed to dummy's 4Q and ran the ♦10. I won with the •K and, con- vinced that my partner held the VQ, con- tinued with a heart. To my horror, Neil won with his VQ, and triumphantly laid his hand on the table, claiming an overtrick.

From now on, be calling him Nasty Neil.

# Q 9 6