19 FEBRUARY 2005, Page 38

Speaking out

Michael Vestey

Now that the law lords appear to care more about the rights of alleged terrorists than they do about protecting the public I suppose we’ll just have to hang around and wait until someone commits a terrorist outrage. It’s difficult to know what to make of these judges: are they in a constant feud with the Home Secretary of the day — it doesn’t matter who it is — or are they genuinely fixated by the disastrous Human Rights Act this government foolishly signed up to?

Perhaps it’s old-fashioned complacency of the kind that affected the FBI before 9/11, as we heard in last week’s Taking a Stand, Fergal Keane’s series about people who speak out, on Radio Four (Tuesday). Coleen Rowley is an FBI lawyer who was told by a colleague that a Moroccan man had just been arrested after asking a flying school in Minnesota to teach him how to fly a jumbo jet even though he couldn’t even pilot a light aircraft. She thought this merited a search of his home and laptop, but her FBI bosses chose not to pursue the matter. Then came 9/11. The Moroccan’s name was Zacharia Moussaoui, and he was found to have links with the leader of the hijackers, Mohammed Atta.

It’s easy, of course, to use hindsight, but it’s also clear that 9/11 could have been prevented. Rowley thinks that, had Moussaoui been properly investigated, the trail would have led to the other hijackers. So why wasn’t he? She thought it was because the authorities refused to believe that the United States could be attacked on its own soil. One of her superiors, she said, had actually imagined that the Moroccan was the type of man who could fly an aircraft into the World Trade Center, but had been told that ‘that ain’t gonna happen’. When she saw 9/11 on television, she thought it must be related to Moussaoui. Then she heard the FBI director denying any knowledge of people being trained at flight schools.

Eventually, she contacted senators, the memo was leaked and it was out in the open. Despite hostility from within the FBI, she wasn’t fired as whistleblowers in Brussels are. She kept her job. ‘If you see the weapons out there right now the potential for something on a greater scale than 9/11 is there, and I think you’d be delusional if you didn’t think it could happen.’ Perhaps she should address the law lords.

Following on from what I wrote last week about American talk radio, I suppose the nearest thing we have to it here is talkSPORT on medium wave. Although much of its content is sport, the station also has its phone-in strands in which the presenters freely air their own views in a way that BBC broadcasters can’t. One morning last week, Ian Collins and Mike Parry took calls on Cherie Blair’s controversial charitable speaking tour of New Zealand and Australia from which she’s said to receive a third of the proceeds. The station mischievously rang Queensland and spoke to her former friend Peter Foster, the man who notoriously helped her to buy the two Bristol flats and who was described by the British press as a conman. He accused Cherie of living beyond her means and of being someone who, in her ‘mad dash for cash’, makes ‘some questionable and stupid decisions’. Foster added, ‘I’ve probably never seen anyone who’s able to go from one catastrophe to another as often as she does. . . ’ From Foster, of course, this is all rather questionable, but in the end I really found it impossible to take sides.

Later in the programme Ellen MacArthur came sailing into Falmouth to a damehood, and Parry and Collins could barely contain their rage: ‘I actually feel I want to vomit ... I cannot tell you in stronger terms what a cynical, dirty, publicity-seeking Downing Street decision that is ... ’ ‘It’s extraordinary,’ added Collins; ‘she hasn’t even got off the boat yet.’ One of them joked that Barbara Windsor will be made a dame for her return appearance in EastEnders. There’s a tabloid sound to talkSPORT, which is hardly surprising as its chief executive is Kelvin Mackenzie. Its coverage of overseas Test tours is good, though, if anything slightly more sober and worthy than Test Match Special. Speaking of the latter, I was glad to hear last month that its presence on Radio Four long wave for the domestic Tests is secure for the next four years. I had feared it would go the way of televised cricket after the ECB’s greedy and blinkered decision to sell the rights to Sky with highlights on Channel Five starting next year, neither of which I and many others can receive or wish to.

My apologies last week for getting my US presidential elections muddled. In 1996 Bill Clinton was the incumbent, of course, not George Bush senior, and he defeated the Republican challenger Bob Dole. Maddening when the memory plays such tricks.