'Sir: Mr Watson sees in Duncan Fallowell's article on the
Rolling Stones' concert the "total abnegation of the critical Function". and the loudness of the music, he feels, is evidence of its worthlessness (Letters, October 6).
Mr Watson is apparently unaware of many of the functions of modern music -7 music of which the Rolling Stones are a foundation. Live concerts stimulate the catharsis of the frustrations of everyday life, and as such provide rewarding and valuable experiences. The Rolling Stones's music is a dramatic statement which, to understand, involves the body as well as the mind. It is through the amplification of sound, in the dynamically sensual effect it has on the diaphragm and a far from unpleasant "
ringing" in the ears, that one is able become physically aware of the music. The aggression that is interpreted from the lyncs and transmitted through dance seems to be of a beneficial and healthy nature, especially since the violent, and indeed evil, tone of Mick Jagger's voice exercises an essentially temporary influence over the audience.
Modern music on a less amplified level has a number of aspects which when presented seriously are validly worthy of serious criticism.
The influence of African rhythm has given contemporary music the ability to involve oneself physically in its appreciation. One should also consider the expanding horizons of personal expression provided in lyrics and poetry, as well as the variety of vocal tone and quality that is evident in many of today's singers.
If Mr Watson is prepared to expand his critical standards, he may find modern music as enjoyable and worthy of criticism as classical music. In doing so he most certainly would not be standing alone.
D. P. Weaver 46 Leverton Street, London NW5
Previous page
