"A MINE OF WEALTH."
[To the Editor of the SPECTATOR.] Si,—In order to clear the issue, which is of high importance, may I make a brief reply to various commentators on my two articles entitled "A Mine of Wealth" ? :-
(I) The title was used, of course, in its metaphorical sense. The Dead Sea potash is not in a mine, in the ordinary sense of the term.
(2) My „information comes from chemists and engineers who began studying the subject on the spot, more than a generation ago.
(3) There are, of course, conflicting views and ambitions about this source of wealth. One group, consisting of expert chemists and engineers, with strong financial backing, is convinced that the Dead Sea can provide the world with much cheaper potash at once ; if their plans are adopted. Another group sees the difficulties rather :than the opportunities. It is disappointing, but interesting, to be assured that Lord Mekhett is one of their number. They may have the surer insight ; but it is unfortunate that they have the support of those whose interests would not be subserved by the pro- vision of cheap potash from a new source.
In general, my object in writing was to persuade farmers to take a more lively interest in this battle of the believers and doubters. The land is the only mine of wealth in which I am interested. It is the biggest and the most essential ; and it will suffer, if for any reason, such as timidity, intrigue or ignorance, so valiant an aid as a cheap potash is need- lessly withheld. The matter needs fuller publicity than it has received.—I am, Sir, &c.,
W. BEACH THOMAS.
Previous page
