MUST ENGLAND'S BEAUTY PERISH ?
[To the Editor of the SPECTATOR.]
Siu,—The article, (Spectator, February 9) discussing this question observes that, " if there is any anxiety to preserve the natural beauty of our country, there is no reason why modern civilization should be allowed to despoil our heritage." Members of the National Trust can satisfy their doubts upon this point by making a visit to Canterbury. In the main street they will see new and gaudy " multiple shops " owned by persons who do not. live in the city, spend no money in or upon the city and care nothing for it. At the northern end they will see u an adjacent hill a water tower so hideous that its utility must be- unquestionable. • The southern end, once picturesque with trees and gardens, is now a desolation in the interest ofbusiness. In the Precincts they will see the ancient Norman arch now partially obscured by a vulgar War Memorial. To the south-west of the city, in one of the most picturesque sites of the neighbourhood, they will find a brand new slum, an example of the ravages wrought
by modern civilization as interpreted by the enterprising land agent and the speculative builder. These and other things may be cause for woad& or for admiration ; whether, after their trip, they will suppcise that anyone cares for historic associations or for the natural beauty of our countryside is
another matter.—I am, Sir, &C., PERCY GODFREY. Brentwood, South Canterbury.
Previous page
