23 FEBRUARY 1951, Page 18

Railway Wages

SIR,—Regarding your editorial note Reason for Railwaymen. Truth is undoubtedly relative, and however basically true your note may be, another truth, still more basic, stands out a mile—that a railwayman and his wife, in these times of rapidly increasing prices, cannot pay their way on £4 16s. per week. This figure is the wage of a porter (before deductions), and many potters have no opportunity of making extra through overtime. I myself am a porter-signalman earning £4 19s. per week. I have no chance of overtime, so with deductions for national insurance and income tax I take home exactly f4 13s. Id.

The railways may " have lost £50 million in three years," but it is a strange system of accountancy that declares any sum less than the £36,000,000 due annually to compensate the ex-shareholders a loss —and a stranger system of morality that uses this fictitious "loss as an excuse to refuse underpaid workers a living wage.—Yours, &c., Flaxmere, Norley, via Warrington, Cheshire. JOHN R. HOLMES.