24 MARCH 1923, Page 37

[To the Editor of the SPECTATOR.] SIR,—If by work is

meant outside occupation that helps to add to her husband's income I should say " Yes ; if necessary for the good of the family and household." Otherwise, it must surely depend upon circumstances.

I consider that a married woman's duties should, in the natural course of events, give her sufficient work at home, especially where there are children. The supervision, watch- fulness and personal contact with her home are of paramount importance and should undoubtedly come first.

In cases where there are no children, a married woman's primary work is still in the house. Where there is leisure and competent assistance I think a woman should set herself to further all schemes for the good of others, child welfare, and the like, and much may be done on social visits by interesting and drawing the attention of many rich and generous friends who yet do not realize all the need and want in the world.—I