5 DECEMBER 1970, Page 20

Palmer v Tynan

Sir: Statement 1 of Tynan's reply to my reply to his reply, agrees with me. Thank God for that. Statement 2. Is this a casual mis- take or a deliberate lie? Statement 3. I am sure Mr Tynan would like us to believe it is 'wildly implausible' that he has cut the soliloquys. I suggest ae wait and see the finished film.

And thunk to you too..