THE SUGAR °BEET INDUSTRY
[To the Editor of the SPECTATOR.] ST11,—I am not sure if the Spectator has declared itself as to the proposed bounty on the cultivation of sugar beet, and I do not remember to have seen any considered judgment by experts on the comparative merits of cane and beet sugar. I know it is contended by refiners of sugar (principally beet) that, when refined, the two are identical, not chemically alone, but absolutely. On the other hand, practical people who have used both in cooking and preserving, &c., are unanimous in saying that there is no comparison possible either in sweetness or other ways. They say that no one would -think of making the best jam or conserves, even in France where beet sugar is used- so extensively, with anything but cane sugar ; and that jam made with beet sugar would not keep. Other people say that bees must not be fed on beet sugar, as it would kill them ; and that, though cane sugar is a specific for some affections of the heart, beet sugar -is 'useless in such cases. If there is any foundation for these statements it seems to be very doubtful policy to encourage the growth of beet which produces inferior sugar -to the still further disadvantage of our tropical posses- sions, where the best sugar in the world is grown. Perhaps I had better add that I have no pecuniary interest in any kind -of sugar. I have also heard that sugar beet grown in this country for some years gradually loses its sweetness—perhaps for want of sufficient sun. It would be worth while to inquire if there is any evidence on this point.—I am, Sir, &c.,
Previous page
