BUT SOME questions do arise. All but the most militaristically
minded Conservatives must see the advantage of some toleration of dissent within the party; after all the present Prime Minister—like his two predecessors—was once a prominent rebel. Bournemouth's treatment of Mr. Nicolson will hardly foster independence and courage in the party. Secondly, it is rare for a constituency association of either party to represent anybody but themselves, so they ought to tread warily. Thirdly, by his treatment of Sir Edward Boyle Mr. Macmillan has shown that orthodoxy on Suez is not an essential requirement for a mem- ber of the Government, so it is odd that it should be made an essential requirement for the Mem- ber for Bournemouth. Lastly, if constituency associations are going to have a row with their Member, can they not do it in a more grown-up Way? Mr. Nicolson has in effect been sent to Coventry by his association, as has Sir Frank Medlicott by his, though by refusing for the Moment to look for another candidate Central Norfolk has set an example to Bournemouth.
Previous page
