22 NOVEMBER 1997, Page 71

BRIDGE

Long shot

Andrew Robson

IRONICALLY one of the most enjoyable times at bridge can be when you are almost (but not quite) certain to lose. This is not masochism; rather, it represents an oppor- tunity to try something flamboyant in a spirit of desperation.

Dealer East North-South vulnerable 4A K V 7 6

• K J 109 8 7 6 *7 4 Q 9 8 6 3

47 4 2

N

V K J 9

8

V 4 2

• A Q 4

W E • 3

*10

S

+KQJ 9 532

4 J 105

VAQ105 3

• 5 2

*A 8 6

The Bidding

South West North East

3+

pass pass 3• pass 3NT pass pass pass West led 410, overtaken by East's 4J, and declarer ducked. he won East's 4K contin- uation with 4A and West had to find a dis- card. His legitimate chance of beating the contract was almost nil — dummy's •s were easily establishable. Even if declarer played a • to dummy's •K and gave West both his •A and *(), the contract would still make (assuming declarer held VAQ). it was the perfect time for a spectacular diversion. West discarded •A! This dis- card appeared from declarer's perspective to be a genuine effort from •Ax in an attempt to promote •Qx in partner's hand. And it appeared to be successful. Declarer led a • to dummy's •K at trick three, but, presuming East to have •Q remaining, he then turned his attentions elsewhere. He led a V to V10 and West's NU and West returned a 4 to dummy's 4K. Dummy's second V was led to VC) and West's VK. West returned a second 4 to dummy's 4A and dummy led a • perforce. Much to declarer's embarrassment it was West who won *Q. He cashed his three remaining 4s and led V9. Declarer won VA but con- ceded the last trick to West's V8. The expert dealer had gone down four entirely because of West's imaginative discard. without which he would have made 3NT easily.