CANE SUGAR VERSUS BEET
[To the Editor of the SPECTATOR.] Sra,—I am not sure if the Spectator has declared itself as to the proposed bounty on the cultivation of sugar beet, and I do not remember to have seen any considered judgment by experts on the comparative merits of cane and beet sugar. , I know it is contended by refiners of sugar (principally beet) that, when refined, the two are identical, not alone chemically, but absolutely. On the other hand, practical people who have used both in cooking and preserving, etc., are unanimous in saying that there is no comparison possible either in sweetness or other ways. They say that no one would think of making the best jam or conserves even in France, where beet sugar is used so extensively, with anything but cane sugar ; and that jam made with beet sugar would not keep. Other people say that bees must not be fed on the syrup of beet sugar because it would kill them ; and that, though cane sugar is a specific for some affections of the heart, beet sugar is useless in such cases. If there is any foundation for these statements, it seems to be very doubtful policy to encourage the growth of beet which produces inferior sugar to the still further disadvan- tage of our tropical possessions where the best sugar in the world is grown. Perhaps I had better add that I have no pecuniary interest in any kind of sugar.
I have also heard that sugar beet grown in this country for some years gradually loses its sweetness, perhaps for want of sufficient sun. It would surely be worth while to enquire if there is any evidence on this point.—I am, Sir, &c.,
J. B. PENNINGTON.
Westminster Chambers, 8 Victoria Street, S.W.1.
Previous page
