We have not a word to say against, but very
many words for, any and every effort to vitalise the Unionist Party and give it energy in the struggle not only for placing an efficient check such as the Referendum on the m w unlimited power of the House of Commons, but for defending the Union from destruction. If, therefore, the new movement simply means an increase of fighting force it has our best possible wishes. If, however, it is intended in fact, though not in name, as a movement against Mr. Balfour and Lord Lansdowne, it must be with- stood to the uttermost. Those who are organizing the London meeting can easily clear up this point and put themselves right with the Party by passing a resolution of confidence in Mr. Balfour and Lord Lansdowne at their first public gather- ing. This will be the test. It is one which we feel sure the saner promoters of the Club will not refuse to accept.
Previous page
