28 DECEMBER 1850, Page 7

Eathaaium.—A serious inaccuracy -crept into the note of the .divoree

ease King versus King, which appeared in our impression of the 14th instant. It stated that one of the grounds on which Mrs. King resisted the application for a divorce made by her husband was "his own adultery with Madame de St. -Jean and other persons." But we find that the charge.against -Mr. King involved-only his adultery withJelie Imhoff, and with no other pereen. The error arose from our misconception of the reports in the daily journals ; we Ilierovered it with regret, and are anxious by correctingat to removetheatre- imitation against an estimable Ithg„lieh lady.