"tiie Great Adult Review."
[To THE EDITOR OP THE " SPECTATOR:] as,—In your issue of July 8th you say that the list of contri- butors published in the English Review (July) constitutes "no proof whatever......
The Wild Oats Theory.
rro THE EDITOR OE THE " SPECTATOR:I Sia,—On this subject Carlyle's views as given in his Essay on Burns are not without interest. Burns "quits the paternal roof. . . and becomes......
Notice.—when "correspondence" Or Articles Are Signed With...
or initials, or with a pseudonym, or are marked " Communicated," the Editor must not necessarily be held to be in agreement with the views therein expressed or with the mode of......
A Disclaimer.
[To THE EDITOR OF THE " SPECTATOR:] SIR,—We should like to draw your attention to one or two remarks in your review of July 8th of "The Woman's Book" published by us. Your......
Wild Oats In Theory And In Practice: A Medical Commentary.
[To ma EDITOR OP THE "SPECTATOR."] SIn, — The recent correspondence in the Spectator on the sowing of wild oats will be none the worse for a medical com- mentary. Here comes the......
(to The Editor Or The " Spectator."1 Sir,—i Do Not
personally uphold the view so violently attacked by Sir William Chance (the wild oats theory) in your issue of last week, nor could any reasonable person gather that I did from......
Th11 ",english Rgvisw " Ann Ins "spectator."
We, the undersigned, have read the article in the Spectator of June 10th attacking the English Review. We can see nothing in the article but a simple act of persecution. A......
Previous page
