[sir: Mr Hilary Rubinstein's Assertior.]
Sir: Mr Hilarn Rubnllstici's assertior. (Letters. 28 August) that he has never spoken to me was clearl based on a lapse of memory. I telephoned him at around I lam or Nlonda IS......
[sir: In His Sad Little Letter (30 August) Mr...]
Sir: In his sad little letter (3() August) MIr Brocklebank claimis that Anthorin Blunt severed ties \ith the National Trust 'months ago.' Would indeed this Were true.......
No Marxist
No Marxist Sir: Clearly TLed Honderick cannot possibl\ be a Marxist. because his letter rebuking me for calling him one is gentle. witt\ and short. All I can add, by was ol......
Sex And The Synod
Sex and the Synod Sir: Peter Nichols's article 'Sex and the Synod' (3() August) is far behlo' the standard usually maintained by that fine journalist. Its wron-lieadcdness is so......
Miracles
Miracles Sir: I find Richard Ingrams's easy acceptance of 'miracles', as evidenced in his review of Mr Marnham's book on Lourdes (29 August). rather distasteful. If it is true,......
[sir: In His Article.]
Sir: In his article * hubris of Anthony I unt' (23 August). Max Hlasthngeerl nt) the charismatic influence that exercised over several generastudents both heterosexual antid......
[sir: Max Hastings Is Right In His Excellent...]
Letters A question of hubris Sir: Max Hastings is right in his excellent lticle 'The hubris of Anthony Blunt' (23 August) to draw attention to the support Which Blunt has......
A Port For Willing Workers
, A port for willing workers I Sir: I was pleased to read Richard West's article on FelixstowNe. but a little sorry that I he did not mention bv name (unless I missed it) the......
Previous page
