23 JULY 1932, page 12

Letters To The Editor

[In view of the length of many of the letters which we receive, we would remind correspondents that we often cannot give space for long letters and that short ones are generally......

[to The Editor Of The Spectator.]

Sin,—In your article "The Old Bailey and the Press," you mention we are entitled to claim that we have the most just and most efficient legal system in the world. But is this a......

[to The Editor Of The Spectator.]

Sin,—An article about the Press which you published last week calls attention to a tendency on the part of certain daily and weekly papers to abuse their freedom in a way which......

[to The Editor Of The Spectator.]

Sin,—With most if not with all that your contributor wrote under the above heading I certainly agree, but I find myself asking the question whether his article was not in......

[to The Editor Of The Spectator.] Sir,—there Is, I Am

led to believe, a severely practical aspect of this matter upon which you have not touched. A prominent barrister once informed me that the defence of poor persons indicted for......

[to The Editor Of The Spectator.] Sir,—like Many Of Your

readers, I welcome your splendid article on "The Old Bailey and the Press," and agree with every , word of it. It is easy but usually inaccurate to explain any . species of......