COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF 'RETURNS.

In this statement, those places where no change which affects the Bill has taken place are not included. All Members whose sentiments are itiniscertained, are given to the Anti-Reformers. The places marked a had one seat vacant in the last computed here as against the Bill. There are four doubtful cases, alt of which are Parliament, which causes the difference in the totals of the first four columns.

Last Returns Present Returns Names. For Agst. For Agst. Loss. Gain.

Andover 2 .... .... 2 Ashburton .......... 1 .... 1 2 .... — 1 ...• 1 . 1.

Bridgenorth .... 1

Banbury, (v) . .. 1

Barnstaple Bramber 1 .... I .. . 2 Bristol 1 .... 1

B 1 .... 1 2 — — . . 1 Caolsitionngi. on 1 .... 1

Cambridge (Univ.) .. 2 .... — — ... 2 2 • ... — Carlisle 1 .... 1 2 .. — ... 1

Carmarthen -- • • • . 1

Coekermouth 1 .... 1 .. . 2 1 . • -

Dover 1 .... 1 ... ... 2 .... — Dunwich 1 .... I .... 2

Durham 2 .. • • — 1 .... 1 Evesham (a a) ....... .... 1 . .. 1 .. . I Guildford 2 .... — -- . • 2 Hampshire .... 2 2 ... • — .. . 2 Hastings 2 .... — --- . • 2 Helston .... 2 1 . ..

Hertford 2 .... — llchester Ipswich . — ....

Leominster I

Leicester 1 .. 1

Lewes Liverpool, (v) — . .. 1 Lincoln — .... 2 London 1 Maidstone 1 . .. 1 Monmouth . — .... 1 Monmouthshire . .. 2 1 . .. 1 Newport (Wight) ... — .... 2 .... 2 Newark ... ..... . — .... 2 1 . . 1 Northampton 1 Nottinghamshire. .. 1 .... 1 Okehampton .... 2 o 0 Retford A: Bassetlaw 1 .... 1 1 Rochtster .... 1

Rye .... .... 2

Sandwich 1 .... 1 Shaftesbury, (v) -.. • •— .... I Southampton 2 ; • — — . 2 Southwark — . . 1 St. Alban's 1 .. 1 2 .... — Stamford . .. 2 Stockbridge . 1 St. Michael's 1 .. 1 — .. . 2 1 — Thetford 2 .... 1 - Tiverton..

Wareham.

Warwick ....... 1 .. . 1

West Lope Westbury I .. . 1 Wilton Woodstock 1 .... 1

Wootton Bassett.... 1 .... 1 .... 2

Wycombe Weymouth Yarmouth (Hants) — .... 2 — — — — — — 48 70 88 35 16 57 16 Majority 91 Clear gain S2 ; or, supposing that the 4 doubtful men prove Reformers, 90. 1 • •